σ Statistics · AS 91586 · 3.14

Apply probability distributions

External 4 credits Normal Binomial Poisson Triangular Rectangular Model choice Assumptions

Model random situations with the right distribution: binomial, Poisson and uniform (discrete) and the normal distribution (continuous). Calculate probabilities, means and standard deviations, and justify your choice of model.

Reference sheet →

Practice

Recall it first, then use it — testing yourself builds the memory, where rereading the notes above only feels easier.

Recall and application shuffled together — you have to work out what each item wants before you can answer it, which is the part the exam actually tests. Both kinds feed the same spacing schedule, so anything you miss comes back sooner.

Say the answer out loud before flipping — that attempt is where the learning happens, even when you get it wrong.

Exam-style only. Instant feedback, shuffled each attempt, best score saved on this device.

What actually comes up

Three real scenarios every year, mixing binomial, Poisson, normal, and triangular/uniform models in the same paper. Every calculation part expects the distribution NAME and its PARAMETERS stated explicitly, and every model is eventually checked against real data (a histogram, a simulation, a stated proportion) and judged for fit — a calculation with no fit-judgement is only half the question.

Across 4 years

12 questions · 41 parts 13 Achieved 15 Merit 13 Excellence

The pattern — what to prepare

TopicAppears inGrade levelWhat to practise
State the distribution NAME and its PARAMETERS as part of every probability calculation 4/4 years, nearly every part A Every schedule requires the model AND parameters stated explicitly, not just the final number — this is its own mark, separate from the arithmetic.
Justify or challenge a distribution's assumptions with a SPECIFIC contextual reason (independence, constant rate) 4/4 years M–E "Identify the assumption, then argue whether it holds" — name the assumption AND give a concrete reason it might fail in THIS context.
Compare a chosen model against real sample data (a histogram, a simulation, an observed proportion) and judge its suitability 4/4 years E "Comparing a model against real data" — the calculation alone is not enough; say whether the model over- or under-estimates, and why, referring to the features of the distributions.
Reading distribution parameters (min, max, mode) directly off a real histogram, table or figure 4/4 years M Triangular/uniform parameters are usually read straight off the given graph or table — cite the actual feature that justifies each parameter.
Combining probabilities across independent stages: a repeated trial, two distributions together, or a conditional probability from one model 4/4 years (2025 Q1/Q3, 2024 Q1/Q2, 2023 Q2, 2022 Q1/Q3) E "Combining probabilities across stages" — work through the chain step by step; identify whether it is a power, a product of two different models, or a conditional ratio.
Recommending one distribution over another with a reason tied to the shape of each distribution (bounded/unbounded, symmetric/skewed) 2022, 2024, 2025 E Naming the structural feature (fixed endpoints, symmetry) that makes one model fit real data better than another is what separates Excellence from a bare numeric comparison.
Giving TWO distinct reasons for or against a modelling choice, not one reason stated twice 4/4 years M Schedules that ask for "TWO reasons" award marks per DISTINCT reason — rephrasing the same idea earns only one mark. Have two genuinely separate justifications ready (e.g. independence AND constant rate) for every model.
Inverse questions: given a required probability, solve backwards for a parameter (λ, μ or σ) 2022, 2025 papers; every year on the wider question index E Set up the equation with the unknown parameter, then solve algebraically — e^(−λ) = 0.01 rearranges to λ = −ln(0.01), the same reversed-direction habit as an inverse normal problem.
2025 Post lengths on X, social media user ages, and false-positive content screening 9 parts

The 2025 paper ↗ Marking schedule ↗

Question One — Post lengths on X

Post lengths for one group of X (Twitter) users follow a normal distribution; a short post is fewer than 80 characters.

  • μ = 150 characters, σ = 30 characters
  • Free-account character limit: 280
  • a(i) Use this normal distribution to estimate the probability that a post is NOT short (fewer than 80 characters). Achieved
  • a(iii) State an assumption you made in the previous calculation, and describe how violating it could affect the accuracy of your estimate. Merit
  • a(iv) Without further probability calculations, use statistical reasoning to explain why the 280-character limit is unlikely to affect this group of users. Excellence

Question Two — Social media user ages

A sample of 131 adult social media users aged 17–82 has its age distribution shown in a histogram, with the largest frequency between 25 and 30 years old.

  • n = 131, ages 17–82
  • Triangular model: a = 17, b = 82, c = 30
  • b(i) Justify the choice of the triangular distribution parameters a = 17, b = 82, c = 30, including an observation from the histogram. Merit
  • b(ii) Use this triangular distribution model to estimate the probability that a randomly chosen user is more than 35 years old. Merit
  • b(iii) Use your answer from (ii) and observations from the histogram to comment on the suitability of the triangular model for this sample. Excellence

Question Three — Screening for harmful content

An automated system screens posts for harmful content in a population where 1 in 10 posts are actually harmful, and separately reports false positives on harmless content.

  • P(harmful) = 0.1
  • False positives per batch of 100: mean 2.1
  • a Use a probability distribution model to estimate the probability of observing fewer than 3 harmful posts among 20 screened, stating the distribution name and parameters. Achieved
  • b Describe the independence assumption used in (a) in context, and discuss whether it is valid for this situation. Merit
  • d A competing system reports at least one false positive in 97% of its batches of 100. Calculate its false-positive rate and use it to compare the accuracy of the two systems. Excellence
2024 Belly-button shape and fluff, the Nature of Navel Fluff study, and washing frequency 9 parts

The 2024 paper ↗ Marking schedule ↗

Question One — Innies, outies, and fluff

The world's first belly-button survey found 96% of respondents had an "innie" belly button; a separate survey found 66% had fluff in their belly button.

  • 96% innie (4% outie)
  • 66% have belly-button fluff
  • a(i) Estimate the probability that in a class of 30 students, no student has an outie belly button, stating the distribution model and parameters. Achieved
  • a(ii) Give TWO reasons why the distribution chosen in (i) is appropriate. Merit
  • a(iii) Estimate the probability that one student in a class of 30 has an outie belly button AND it contains fluff. Merit

Question Two — The Nature of Navel Fluff study

A 2009 study (Steinhauser) recorded the weight of the author's own daily belly-button fluff over 502 days; a triangular distribution was proposed to model it.

  • n = 502 days
  • Triangular model: min = 0, max = 7.4, mode = 1.0 mg
  • a(ii) Using the given parameters, estimate the probability that on any given day the fluff weight is less than 1.5 mg. Achieved
  • a(iii) Suggest alternative parameters for a triangular distribution that would fit the data better, and justify your choice. Excellence
  • b(iii) T = towels used per person per day; C = clothing changes per day. SD(C) = 0.5; SD(T + C) = 1.754. Are T and C independent? Comment on what this suggests, supporting your answer with statistical statements and calculations. Excellence

Question Three — Belly-button washing frequency

A 2012 study of 138 people recorded belly-button washing frequency per 7-day week; a media headline claimed "less than a quarter of US citizens wash their belly button daily."

  • n = 138
  • Poisson model: λ = 2.8 washes/week
  • a Comment on whether the headline is correct, supporting your answer with statistical calculations and reasoning. Merit
  • b(i) Use a Poisson model (λ = 2.8/week) to estimate the probability that a randomly selected person washes their belly button at least once in a day. Achieved
  • b(iv) Based on a 1000-trial simulation compared with the observed data, discuss whether the Poisson model appears appropriate for this data. Excellence
2023 Sheep stocking rates, wool fineness, and dairy cow milk production 7 parts

The 2023 paper ↗ Marking schedule ↗

Question One — Sheep stocking rates, and wool fineness

Average sheep stocking rates on NZ hills and mountains are 9 sheep per hectare; sheep are known to flock together. A separate sample of 49 Awassi sheep has its wool fineness (in microns) shown in a histogram.

  • Average rate: 9 sheep/hectare
  • Wool fineness sample: n = 49
  • a(i) Use a suitable probability distribution to estimate the probability of more than 10 sheep on a given hectare, stating the distribution name and parameters. Achieved
  • a(ii) Give TWO reasons why sheep flocking together may affect your choice of distribution and its required conditions. Merit
  • b(i) Using a uniform distribution, calculate the probability that a randomly selected Awassi sheep's wool fineness is greater than 35 microns, stating the parameters used. Achieved

Question Two — A hen's egg-laying rate

A hen's egg-laying rate is modelled by a Poisson distribution; she lays at least one egg each week 99.73% of the time.

  • a(i) Calculate an estimate for the average number of eggs the hen lays each week. Achieved
  • a(ii) What is the most likely number of eggs the hen will lay each week? Justify your answer with statistical reasoning or calculations. Merit
  • a(iii) Each of the 10 eggs independently does or doesn't hatch, with probability 0.65. Calculate the probability that 9 or more of the 10 eggs hatch.
    • Hatch probability per egg: 0.65
    • 10 eggs laid, each independent
    Excellence

Question Three — Dairy cow milk production

Total milk production per NZ dairy cow per season is modelled as normal; for South Island cows specifically, approximately 30% produce less than 4290 kg per season.

  • NZ model: μ = 4370 kg, σ = 1350 kg
  • South Island: 30% produce < 4290 kg
  • a(i) Discuss whether the normal distribution model described is appropriate for modelling South Island dairy cow milk production, supporting your answer with statistical calculations. Excellence
2022 Clothing retailer purchases, defect rates by supplier, and customer spend per transaction 16 parts

The 2022 paper ↗ Marking schedule ↗

Question One — Retail purchases

For a NZ clothing retail company, a purchase is made by 35% of customers entering their stores. The company has many stores throughout New Zealand.

  • p = 0.35 per customer
  • n = 10 customers per store
  • a(i) Using an appropriate probability distribution model, calculate an estimate for the probability that fewer than 3 of the next 10 shoppers make a purchase. Achieved
  • a(ii) Give TWO assumptions made for the probability distribution model used in (i). Merit
  • a(iii) Using an appropriate probability distribution model, calculate an estimate for the probability that at least 3 out of the next 10 customers make a purchase in each of 4 different stores. Merit
  • a(iv) An assumption was made when calculating the probability estimate in (iii). Justify this assumption in context. Excellence
  • b A "click and collect" order is ready any time between 24 and 144 hours (uniform). A "home delivery" order time is normal with mean 96 hours, standard deviation 38.4 hours. Two friends each order at the same time, one by each method. Using appropriate probability model(s), estimate the probability that both friends wait more than 120 hours, justifying any assumptions made. Excellence

Question Two — Items purchased and defect rates

The number of items purchased per 20-minute interval is modelled by a Poisson distribution with λ = 2.8. Stock arrives in boxes of 50, checked for defects; defect counts are given for two suppliers.

  • λ = 2.8 items per 20 min
  • Supplier A: P(D=0..3) = 0.73, 0.16, 0.09, 0.02
  • Supplier B: P(D=0..3) = 0.66, 0.23, 0.07, 0.04
  • a(i) Use the Poisson model to estimate the probability that a customer purchases fewer than 4 items in a 20-minute interval. Achieved
  • a(ii) Give TWO reasons why the Poisson distribution may not be appropriate to model this situation. Merit
  • a(iii) What value would λ need to be so that at least 99% of customers purchase at least 1 item in a 20-minute interval? Excellence
  • b(i) Calculate the mean and standard deviation of the number of defects per box of 50 items from Supplier A. Achieved
  • b(ii) Using statistical reasoning, explain which supplier better fulfils the requirement of low, consistent defect counts. Merit

Question Three — Customer spend per transaction

A retail company records spend per transaction over 100 transactions: mean

27.75, standard deviation $46.22, most common spend
30, maximum spend $250. 33 of the 100 transactions were over
50.

  • n = 100 transactions
  • μ =
    27.75, σ = $46.22
  • mode =
    30, max = $250
  • a It is claimed that over 25% of transactions are more than
    50. Use a calculation to decide whether this claim is correct. Achieved
  • b Use a normal distribution model to estimate the probability that a randomly chosen customer spends more than
    50. Achieved
  • c Suggest an alternative model for customer spend at this store, stating its parameters. Merit
  • d Use your alternative model to estimate the probability that a customer spends more than
    50, given that they spend more than
    30. Merit
  • e Compare your two probability estimates with the observed proportion from the data. Which model gives the closer estimate? Excellence
  • f Recommend which model should be used for this store's spend data, justifying your choice by referring to the features of each distribution. Excellence

A model-fit judgement (over/underestimate, appropriate/not appropriate) rewards a stated verdict with the calculation as the reason — a correct probability with no verdict on fit, or a verdict with no calculation, both fall short of the top band.

Past exams & resources

Past exams & marking schedules, AS 91586 (last 5 years)
YearExam paperMarking schedulePractice
2025 Exam paper Marking schedule
2024 Exam paper Marking schedule
2023 Exam paper Marking schedule
2022 Exam paper Marking schedule
2021 Exam paper Marking schedule

⏱ Timed opens the paper and starts a countdown matching the exam length. Official NZQA PDFs. If a link 404s, that year’s paper may sit under a slightly different code: browse the NZQA subject page.

MathsNZ Students (3.14) — Jake Wills Videos, notes and activities for this standard specifically. Formulae and Tables Booklet You are given this in the exam — practise with it open so you know where everything is. NCEAce Targeted questions BY GRADE LEVEL, past exams and videos — useful when you want Excellence-level questions specifically. Liz Sneddon — Year 13 site Videos and guidance for each achievement standard. Liz Sneddon — YouTube Videos working through past papers. Cushla Thomson — YouTube Past exam questions with fully worked solutions. LearnCOACH — YouTube Videos on each standard. Wild About Statistics — YouTube Auckland University. Good for developing the abstract thinking Excellence questions want. NZQA assessment reports (Mathematics) Markers’ own comments on what they were looking for at each grade. Worth reading before a mock. NZQA, Statistics L3 (91586) past papers & schedules Official exams + assessment schedules NZQA, Mathematics & Statistics subject page Assessment specifications, clarifications and exemplars