← Internal factors in a global business
How this connects to the other Level 3 Business Studies standards
This standard's benefit/cost/judgement shape is the internal-factor mirror of 91380's external-factor evaluation — the same reasoning discipline, turned inward on the business's own choices.Shared habits across the Level 3 Business Studies externals
- The "how likely is it..." judgement here is structurally identical to 91380's justified conclusion: a position, the strongest point each way, and a decisive reason — just applied to an internal choice rather than a response to an external factor.
- Quality management (QC/QA/TQM) recurs as a shared topic with 91381 — the same three systems, the same scope ladder, examined from two different angles.
- Tikanga Māori concepts and kaitiakitanga appear across 91379, 91380 and 91381 alike — learning the concepts once, with a genuine example ready, serves all three standards.
Why this matters for revision order
If you have already built a strong quality-management answer for 91381, the same content largely transfers here — the difference is that 91379 wants it examined as an internal factor's own benefit/cost/likelihood, not as part of a wider recommendation.Before writing anything
- Identify which internal factor is being asked about — quality management, innovation, change management, or IP/tikanga — and check whether the given business can be swapped for your own studied one.